Architecture review
A written, fixed-scope assessment with priced recommendations. Zero pressure to engage further — most buyers start here.
You need a second pair of eyes before a migration, refactor, or vendor swap.
Pillar / Build · iOS & Android
Native iOS and Android by default. React Native or Flutter when the matrix justifies it. The pod owns the signing keys, the crash budget, and the store-listing assets — not just the source.
01 · Platform matrix
We don't have a default. The matrix below is how we pick on a real project — features, team, distribution.
When platform integration is the product — Apple Pay, HealthKit, ARKit, deep StoreKit. Or when iOS is the only audience.
When background services, hardware integrations, or store-of-record requirements demand the JVM and the Android runtime. EMM-friendly.
When you have a React web team, ≥ 60% UI overlap iOS↔Android, and no exotic native modules. We don't ship Hermes-only — both engines tested.
When the design language must be pixel-identical across platforms (and the brand can sustain non-native gestures). Material/Cupertino as appropriate.
02 · What you get
Not aspirational — written into the SOW and delivered before the App Store screenshot session.
iOS bundle id + provisioning, Android keystore in your vault, both stores' developer accounts in your name.
TestFlight + Play internal testing wired to PR builds. So a release candidate is one tag away, not a manual rebuild.
Crashlytics or Sentry wired to your on-call. Crash-free rate target signed in the SOW; regressions auto-page.
03 · How we deliver
Mobile has unique cutover risk — store review, signing, certificate expiry. Submission is a planned phase, not an afterthought.
Platform decision (matrix above), distribution model, store policy review. Output: SOW with crash-free rate target and store deadline.
Repos, CI signing, both stores' developer accounts, first build to TestFlight & Play internal by end of week 4.
Biweekly internal release, monthly external beta. Crash-free rate trended weekly. Scope changes are written.
Store-listing assets, privacy nutrition labels, App Privacy questionnaires, content-rating forms. We handle the review back-and-forth.
04 · How to engage
Same pod, four contracting shapes. Most mobile buyers start with a 3-week architecture review.
A written, fixed-scope assessment with priced recommendations. Zero pressure to engage further — most buyers start here.
You need a second pair of eyes before a migration, refactor, or vendor swap.
A defined deliverable, a fixed timeline, a quoted price. We ship, hand off, and stay on call through stabilization.
The scope is clear and the date matters more than ongoing capacity.
A named pod, a unified SLA, and a monthly executive review. The team you'd hire if you weren't trying to stay lean.
Multiple workstreams, a roadmap longer than a year, no time to coordinate vendors.
One senior engineer (SRE, platform, ML, security) placed inside your team for 6+ months, accountable to your manager — backed by ours.
You have leadership and tooling, but a specific seat is empty and contracting cycles are too slow.
Indicative ranges in the calculator
Open the calculator05 · FAQ
Pick from the matrix above. We don't oversell cross-platform — if features are platform-bound, we'll say so before SOW.
You. We never publish under our org. Your team holds the keys; we get a transferable role.
Either we transfer to your team (KT included), or you stay on a managed-operations retainer. Default is KT in 2 weeks.
A 3-week architecture review for an existing app. Crash-rate audit, build-system audit, store-policy risk read.
06 · Pairs with
07 · Engage
One delivery lead replies within a business day. Architecture reviews are fixed-scope and can be priced in the same reply.