Architecture review
A written, fixed-scope assessment with priced recommendations. Zero pressure to engage further — most buyers start here.
You need a second pair of eyes before a migration, refactor, or vendor swap.
Pillar / Build · Design
Product design, design systems, and research run as the same workstream that ships features. Figma sources, tokens, and component libraries — handed off in a state your engineers can use as-is.
01 · What we ship
Pick the closest. The pod composition stays the same — staff designer, mid-level, researcher, plus shared engineering.
Feature flows, IA, hi-fi mocks. Tied to engineering velocity — design isn't ahead of the build, it's beside it.
Tokens, primitives, components — Figma + code in the same release. Built so your designers and engineers don't drift.
Generative + evaluative, sized to your decisions. Recruiting, moderation, synthesis — and a research repo your PMs can actually search.
When the design needs micro-interactions, motion, or pixel-tight rendering — designers who write production code, not just specs.
02 · What you get
Tokenized, versioned, and owned by your team afterwards.
Single source of truth for color, type, spacing, motion — exported to CSS variables, Swift, and Compose in one pipeline.
React + Storybook by default. Each component shipped with accessibility tests, visual regression baselines, and a usage guideline.
Notion or Dovetail. Tagged interview clips, synthesis docs, decision log. So insights survive the people who gathered them.
Architecture map, contribution guide, governance model. Your designers and engineers can extend the system without us.
03 · How we deliver
Design isn't a phase before engineering. It runs alongside, with measurable handoffs every two weeks.
Audit existing surface, run lightweight research, name the constraints. Output: a problem framing doc + token audit.
Information architecture, key flows, design-system rules. By end of week 4, the team has a usable Figma library and a contribution guide.
Biweekly demo against engineering velocity. Components ship in code + Figma in the same release.
Usability testing, accessibility audit, contribution model handoff. We hand over the keys — your team owns the system.
04 · How to engage
Same pod, four contracting shapes. Most design buyers start with the readiness audit.
A written, fixed-scope assessment with priced recommendations. Zero pressure to engage further — most buyers start here.
You need a second pair of eyes before a migration, refactor, or vendor swap.
A defined deliverable, a fixed timeline, a quoted price. We ship, hand off, and stay on call through stabilization.
The scope is clear and the date matters more than ongoing capacity.
A named pod, a unified SLA, and a monthly executive review. The team you'd hire if you weren't trying to stay lean.
Multiple workstreams, a roadmap longer than a year, no time to coordinate vendors.
One senior engineer (SRE, platform, ML, security) placed inside your team for 6+ months, accountable to your manager — backed by ours.
You have leadership and tooling, but a specific seat is empty and contracting cycles are too slow.
Indicative ranges in the calculator
Open the calculator05 · FAQ
Both. Extensions need a 1-week token audit before scope — we won't quote on a system we haven't read.
Figma + code by default. Figma-only is rare — usually a sign the design system isn't being used.
Your team. Handover includes a written governance model + a 4-hour contribution workshop. Optional retainer if you want us on call.
A 2-week design-system readiness audit. Token coverage, accessibility gaps, contribution-friction read.
06 · Pairs with
07 · Engage
One delivery lead replies within a business day. Readiness audits are fixed-scope and can be priced in the same reply.